4.5; Never before have I seen a zombie film with so many layers. The symbolic meaning of the infection is announced from the very beginning through footage and words to be 'rage', and the violence induced by it henceforward becomes the centre of the film's criticism. But what adds to the film's complexity is the fact that the protagonist is empowered only by rage to fight for those he loves and defeat the purposeless soldiers, who by contrast fight for nothing but themselves. The film thus indicates a place for violence in humanity and hints that violence is not inherently the abject. It also draws a comparison between two archetypes of fatherhood: permissive & autocratic
每个镜头都以长短不一的黑幕结尾声音却从不会停止一切谶语都隐藏在黑幕前或幕起几乎全部使用全景有很有意思的构图(开幕飞机来去;铁路旁的对回去的对话;海边抽烟)表妹无论多么日常性的语言都让人觉得她酷的不行“Who is courguy”三人足够疏离在纽约克利夫兰佛罗里达这一切就如表哥在开车驶离前问路边等公车的男人“你能想象在工厂工作吗”“但我感到难过”这种地景的转移和是否在场仍是极为类似的问题 最后一幕几乎理所当然表哥去布达佩斯朋友开车离去表妹再次回到旅馆抽烟可是“你为什么去布达佩斯”这就是电影里太多问题里的答案 另:能让人想起《99久久国产热无码精品免费》和《XAXWASWASWASXILXILX68免费》前者是因为同样用了房间—车的过程后者则是更大程度的情节相似表妹来访再寻找二者做了爱这部没有